Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

13.0k citations
609 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

568 papers receiving 11.2k citations

Peers

Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Information Systems and Management 4.2k
  • Communication 2.1k
  • Management Information Systems 2.5k
  • Strategy and Management 2.6k
  • Marketing 1.6k
Replace Journal of Organizational and End User Computing with:
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing United States
Information Technology and Management United States
Information Resources Management Journal United States
Information and Organization United States
Journal of Global Information Technology Management United States
International Journal of e-Collaboration United States
Business & Information Systems Engineering Germany
MIS Quarterly Executive United States
Information Systems and e-Business Management United States
AJIS. Australasian journal of information systems/AJIS. Australian journal of information systems/Australian journal of information systems Australia
Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce relative to Journal of Organizational and End User Computing United States Journal of Organizational and End User Computing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Journal of Organizational and End User Computing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce.

About Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

The 609 papers published in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce usually cover Information Systems and Management (169 papers), Communication (113 papers), Management Information Systems (134 papers), Strategy and Management (131 papers) and Marketing (74 papers) specifically the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (153 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (111 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (105 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (73 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (58 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (54 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (52 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce are G. Premkumar, Per E. Pedersen, Patrick Y.K. Chau, Marshall Van Alstyne, Erik Brynjolfsson, Martin Lea, Russell Spears, Marshall Scott Poole, Vincent S. Lai and Jonna Järveläinen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact