Countries where authors publish in Chinese Optics Letters
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Optics Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Optics Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Optics Letters more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Chinese Optics Letters
This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Optics Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Optics Letters.
About Chinese Optics Letters
The 5.3k papers published in Chinese Optics Letters in the last decades have received a total of 29.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Chinese Optics Letters usually cover Acoustics and Ultrasonics (106 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.2k papers) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (3.2k papers) specifically the topics of Photonic and Optical Devices (1.1k papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (892 papers), Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors (657 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (574 papers), Optical Network Technologies (500 papers), Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (465 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (388 papers) and Advanced Photonic Communication Systems (338 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Optics Letters are Lili Hu, Yufei Ma, Bo Guo, Jing Xu, Jian Wang, H. Ahmad, Jian Wang, Xiaonan Liu, Ibrahim Abdulhalim and Changhe Zhou.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.