Opinião Pública

469 papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 469 papers published in Opinião Pública in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Opinião Pública usually cover Political Science and International Relations (307 papers), Sociology and Political Science (268 papers) and Communication (153 papers) specifically the topics of Politics and Society in Latin America (216 papers), Social Media and Politics (149 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Opinião Pública are Yan de Souza Carreirão, Lúcio Rennó, Leonardo Avritzer, Dalson Britto Figueiredo Filho, José Alexandre da Silva Júnior, Simone Bohn, José Álvaro Moisés, David Samuels, Gláucio Ary Dillon Soares and Luís Felipe Miguel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Opinião Pública

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Opinião Pública. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Opinião Pública.

Countries where authors publish in Opinião Pública

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Opinião Pública. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Opinião Pública with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Opinião Pública more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025