Replace BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation with:
BMC Sports Science Medicine and RehabilitationChina
Research in Sports MedicineUnited States
International Journal of Sports Physical TherapyUnited States
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise MedicineUnited Kingdom
Sports Medicine - OpenAustralia
Journal of Functional Morphology and KinesiologyItaly
Sports BiomechanicsUnited States
Muscles Ligaments and Tendons JournalItaly
International journal of exercise scienceUnited States
Biology of SportSpain
BMC Sports Science Medicine and RehabilitationChinaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Isokinetics and Exercise Science · 1×
×0.95.5kOSM
×0.72.2kBE
×1.12.8kSURGE
×0.8868PHARM
×1.51.1kREHAB
Citations per year, relative to Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Isokinetics and Exercise Science · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isokinetics and Exercise Science more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science
This network shows the impact of papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Isokinetics and Exercise Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.