New Zealand Journal of Botany

2.7k papers and 39.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany in the last decades have received a total of 39.7k indexed citations. Papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany usually cover Plant Science (1.5k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.5k papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (653 papers) specifically the topics of Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (581 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (567 papers) and Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (564 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Zealand Journal of Botany are P. Wardle, David G. Lloyd, H. E. Connor, C. J. Webb, S. J. Hughes, A. F. Mark, Fred R. Ganders, C. J. Burrows, N. T. Moar and E. J. Godley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany.

Countries where authors publish in New Zealand Journal of Botany

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Zealand Journal of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Zealand Journal of Botany more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025