npj Digital Medicine

1.4k papers and 41.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in npj Digital Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 41.4k indexed citations. Papers published in npj Digital Medicine usually cover Artificial Intelligence (302 papers), Health Informatics (285 papers) and General Health Professions (224 papers) specifically the topics of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (285 papers), Machine Learning in Healthcare (178 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (148 papers). The most active scholars publishing in npj Digital Medicine are Bertalan Meskó, Eric J. Topol, Daniel C. Baumgart, Daniel Sadowski, Richard N. Fedorak, Karen I. Kroeker, Reed T. Sutton, Stan Benjamens, Pranavsingh Dhunnoo and Michael D. Abràmoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in npj Digital Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in npj Digital Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in npj Digital Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in npj Digital Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in npj Digital Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in npj Digital Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites npj Digital Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025