Measurement Science Review

575 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 575 papers published in Measurement Science Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Measurement Science Review usually cover Electrical and Electronic Engineering (167 papers), Mechanical Engineering (137 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (122 papers) specifically the topics of Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (59 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (54 papers) and Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Measurement Science Review are Adam Głowacz, Pornchai Phukpattaranont, Angkoon Phinyomark, Chusak Limsakul, Zhaozong Meng, Mamun Bin Ibne Reaz, Krzysztof Nadolny, Wojciech Kapłonek, Jun Su and Zulkifly Abbas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Measurement Science Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Measurement Science Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Measurement Science Review.

Countries where authors publish in Measurement Science Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Measurement Science Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Measurement Science Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Measurement Science Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025