The Journal of Nietzsche Studies

452 papers and 1.0k indexed citations

About

The 452 papers published in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies usually cover Philosophy (371 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (42 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (37 papers) specifically the topics of Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (341 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (162 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (113 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies are Rebecca Bamford, Ken Gemes, David Owen, Herman Siemens, Thomas H. Brobjer, Paul S. Loeb, Lawrence J. Hatab, Keith Ansell‐Pearson, Richard Schacht and Vanessa Lemm.

In The Last Decade

The Journal of Nietzsche Studies

255 papers receiving 701 citations

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Nietzsche Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Nietzsche Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026