Strahlentherapie und Onkologie

3.1k papers and 51.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie in the last decades have received a total of 51.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.4k papers), Radiation (917 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (834 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (901 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (343 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (267 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie are N. Hodapp, Rolf Sauer, Jürgen Debus, Michael Flentje, Frederik Wenz, Matthias Gückenberger, Rainer Fietkau, Dirk Rades, Jürgen Dunst and Volker Budach.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

Countries where authors publish in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strahlentherapie und Onkologie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025