Countries where authors publish in Neurology Genetics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurology Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurology Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurology Genetics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurology Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurology Genetics.
About Neurology Genetics
The 696 papers published in Neurology Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 7.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Neurology Genetics usually cover Neurology (174 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (192 papers) and Neurology (85 papers) specifically the topics of Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (132 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (131 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (99 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (89 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (86 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (71 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (57 papers) and RNA regulation and disease (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurology Genetics are Stefan M. Pulst, Daniel R. Scoles, Eric Vallabh Minikel, Gary W. Beecham, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Christiane Reitz, Massimo Pandolfo, Henry Houlden, Jennifer Roggenbuck and David S. Lynch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.