Review of Economic Dynamics

1.2k papers and 40.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Review of Economic Dynamics in the last decades have received a total of 40.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Economic Dynamics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (512 papers) and Accounting (291 papers) specifically the topics of Economic theories and models (502 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (370 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (280 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Economic Dynamics are David K. Levine, Thomas J. Sargent, Richard Rogerson, Timothy Cogley, Diego Restuccia, Robert Shimer, Vincenzo Quadrini, Edward C. Prescott, Giovanni L. Violante and Garth Heutel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Economic Dynamics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Economic Dynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Economic Dynamics.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Economic Dynamics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Economic Dynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Economic Dynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Economic Dynamics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025