This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Adsorption. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Adsorption with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adsorption more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Adsorption. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Adsorption.
About Adsorption
The 2.1k papers published in Adsorption in the last decades have received a total of 51.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Adsorption usually cover Water Science and Technology (353 papers), Spectroscopy (274 papers), Inorganic Chemistry (235 papers), Mechanical Engineering (308 papers) and Materials Chemistry (148 papers) specifically the topics of Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal (332 papers), Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials (250 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (193 papers), Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis (166 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (82 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (62 papers), Adsorption and Cooling Systems (47 papers) and Industrial Gas Emission Control (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Adsorption are Shivaji Sircar, Yuh‐Shan Ho, Matthias Thommes, Stefano Brandani, Paul A. Webley, Katie A. Cychosz, Teofil Jesionowski, Ralph T. Yang, Nick D. Hutson and Alírio Egídio Rodrigues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.