Nature Reviews Microbiology

2.7k papers and 504.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.7k papers published in Nature Reviews Microbiology in the last decades have received a total of 504.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Microbiology usually cover Molecular Biology (1.2k papers), Infectious Diseases (586 papers) and Ecology (561 papers) specifically the topics of Gut microbiota and health (293 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (278 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (276 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Microbiology are Hans‐Curt Flemming, Kim A. Brogden, Jost Wingender, Paul Stoodley, Noah Fierer, Bruce E. Logan, Luanne Hall‐Stoodley, Curtis A. Suttle, Zheng‐Li Shi and Dan I. Andersson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Microbiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Microbiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Microbiology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Microbiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Microbiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Microbiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Microbiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025