Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

2.3k papers and 180.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology in the last decades have received a total of 180.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology usually cover Oncology (1.2k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (660 papers) and Molecular Biology (553 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (347 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (252 papers) and Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (251 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology are Rakesh K. Jain, Guido Kroemer, Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos, Alice T. Shaw, Ibiayi Dagogo‐Jack, Klaus Pantel, Julienne E. Bower, Robert A. Weinberg, Tsukasa Shibue and Richard S. Finn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025