Natural Product Research

9.6k papers and 109.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.6k papers published in Natural Product Research in the last decades have received a total of 109.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Natural Product Research usually cover Molecular Biology (4.7k papers), Plant Science (4.2k papers) and Food Science (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2.5k papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (2.4k papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (1.7k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Natural Product Research are Alessandro Venditti, Maurizio Bruno, M. Iqbal Choudhary, Armandodoriano Bianco, Kajal Chakraborty, Boris Pejin, Ain Raal, Anne Orav, Arshad Javaid and Nicola Cicero.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Natural Product Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Natural Product Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Natural Product Research.

Countries where authors publish in Natural Product Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Natural Product Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Natural Product Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natural Product Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025