Nanomedicine Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine · 1×
×0.936k/40kBIOMA
×0.79k/14kPS
×0.944k/49kBE
×0.83k/5kMM
×0.828k/37kMC
Citations per year
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Nanomedicine
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nanomedicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nanomedicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanomedicine more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Nanomedicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nanomedicine.
About Nanomedicine
The 2.8k papers published in Nanomedicine in the last decades have received a total of 110.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Nanomedicine usually cover Biomaterials (1.0k papers), Pharmaceutical Science (273 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (882 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (515 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (511 papers), Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (297 papers), Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (285 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (283 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (203 papers) and Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nanomedicine are Si‐Shen Feng, Peter L. Choyke, Hisataka Kobayashi, Michelle Longmire, Jesse V. Jokerst, Richard N. Zare, Sanjiv S. Gambhir, Tatsiana Lobovkina, Gang Bao and Samantha Gray.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.