Biomaterials Science

4.3k papers and 107.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Biomaterials Science in the last decades have received a total of 107.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Biomaterials Science usually cover Biomedical Engineering (2.1k papers), Biomaterials (1.5k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (991 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (710 papers) and RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (573 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomaterials Science are Amir A. Zadpoor, Kazuki Fukushima, Ovijit Chaudhuri, Ali Khademhosseini, Fu‐Jian Xu, Yu Shrike Zhang, Xian Jun Loh, İlyas İnci, Mehmet R. Dokmeci and Hao Hu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biomaterials Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomaterials Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomaterials Science.

Countries where authors publish in Biomaterials Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomaterials Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomaterials Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomaterials Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025