Science & Technology Studies

473 papers and 5.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 473 papers published in Science & Technology Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Science & Technology Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (125 papers), Global and Planetary Change (43 papers) and Management of Technology and Innovation (39 papers) specifically the topics of Information Systems Theories and Implementation (37 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (35 papers) and Climate Change Communication and Perception (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science & Technology Studies are N. Derek Brown, Nicholas J. Rowland, Petri Ylikoski, Jason Patton, Monika Kurath, Aaro Tupasela, John Ziman, Wiebe E. Bijker, Sampsa Hyysalo and Nathan E. Kruis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Science & Technology Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science & Technology Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science & Technology Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Science & Technology Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science & Technology Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science & Technology Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science & Technology Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025