The Journal of General Physiology
About
In The Last Decade
The Journal of General Physiology
6.5k papers receiving 305.9k citations
Fields of papers published in The Journal of General Physiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of General Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of General Physiology.
Countries where authors publish in The Journal of General Physiology
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of General Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of General Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of General Physiology more than expected).
- ATPase Activity of Myosin Correlated with Speed of Muscle Shortening (1967)
- Muscarinic activation of ionic currents measured by a new whole-cell recording method. (1988)
- Ionic Blockage of Sodium Channels in Nerve (1973)
- Tetrodotoxin Blockage of Sodium Conductance Increase in Lobster Giant Axons (1964)
- Kinetics of Water Loss from Cells at Subzero Temperatures and the Likelihood of Intracellular Freezing (1963)
- INHIBITORY INTERACTION OF RECEPTOR UNITS IN THE EYE OF LIMULUS (1957)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.