Molecular Syndromology

640 papers and 7.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 640 papers published in Molecular Syndromology in the last decades have received a total of 7.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular Syndromology usually cover Genetics (373 papers), Molecular Biology (365 papers) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (68 papers) specifically the topics of Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (170 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (111 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Syndromology are Martin Poot, Heather E. McDermid, Katy Phelan, Hilde Van Esch, Nadia Bahi‐Buisson, Thierry Bienvenu, Marco Tartaglia, Giuseppe Zampino, Bruce D. Gelb and Christopher Cunniff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular Syndromology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Syndromology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Syndromology.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Syndromology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Syndromology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Syndromology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Syndromology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025