Future Science OA

782 papers and 9.4k indexed citations

About

The 782 papers published in Future Science OA in the last decades have received a total of 9.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Future Science OA usually cover Molecular Biology (198 papers), Oncology (115 papers) and Surgery (96 papers) specifically the topics of Computational Drug Discovery Methods (31 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (19 papers) and MicroRNA in disease regulation (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Future Science OA are N. M. Newmark, Anestis S. Veletsos, Nihat Dilsiz, Xavier Montagutelli, Françoise Barré‐Sinoussi, Khaled M. Aboshanab, Jürgen Bajorath, Mohamad Aljofan, Dieter Riethmacher and Sergio Huerta.

In The Last Decade

Future Science OA

680 papers receiving 9.1k citations

Fields of papers published in Future Science OA

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Future Science OA. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Future Science OA.

Countries where authors publish in Future Science OA

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Future Science OA. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Future Science OA with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Future Science OA more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026