Countries where authors publish in Molecular Breeding
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Breeding. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Breeding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Breeding more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Breeding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Breeding.
About Molecular Breeding
The 3.1k papers published in Molecular Breeding in the last decades have received a total of 98.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Molecular Breeding usually cover Plant Science (2.8k papers), Horticulture (45 papers), Genetics (894 papers), Biotechnology (246 papers) and Molecular Biology (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (775 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (670 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (538 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (457 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (383 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (305 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (255 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (233 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Breeding are James C. Nelson, W. Powell, Michele Morgante, Antoni Rafalski, Scott Tingey, Julie M. Vogel, Michael K. Hanafey, Mathias Lorieux, Masumi Yamagishi and Paul Christou.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.