Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

2.2k papers and 69.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter in the last decades have received a total of 69.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter usually cover Plant Science (1.7k papers), Molecular Biology (1.4k papers) and Genetics (228 papers) specifically the topics of Plant Molecular Biology Research (421 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (381 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (284 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter are Richard Jefferson, Stephen L. Dellaporta, James Hicks, Jonathan Wood, K. Arumuganathan, Elizabeth D. Earle, John Cairney, Steven D. Tanksley, Bernard R. Baum and L. Grant Bailey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

Countries where authors publish in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Plant Molecular Biology Reporter more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025