Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

4.4k papers and 285.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.4k papers published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics in the last decades have received a total of 285.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics usually cover Molecular Biology (3.3k papers), Spectroscopy (1.4k papers) and Cell Biology (499 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1.3k papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (643 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (464 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics are Matthias Mann, N. Leigh Anderson, Ruedi Aebersold, Norman G. Anderson, Jesper V. Olsen, Jürgen Cox, Ole N. Jensen, Hanno Steen, Akhilesh Pandey and Alexey I. Nesvizhskii.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular & Cellular Proteomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular & Cellular Proteomics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025