Modernism/modernity

886 papers and 4.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 886 papers published in Modernism/modernity in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Modernism/modernity usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (416 papers), Sociology and Political Science (217 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (161 papers) specifically the topics of Poetry Analysis and Criticism (123 papers), Art, Politics, and Modernism (117 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modernism/modernity are Aldon Lynn Nielsen, Esther da Costa Meyer, Celia Marshik, Susan Stanford Friedman, Hugh Kenner, Miriam Hansen, Margaret Olin, Jeffrey T. Schnapp, Çharles N. Bernstein and Gavin Lucas.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modernism/modernity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modernism/modernity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modernism/modernity.

Countries where authors publish in Modernism/modernity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modernism/modernity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modernism/modernity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modernism/modernity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025