Countries where authors publish in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the South African Veterinary Association more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association.
About Journal of the South African Veterinary Association
The 1.0k papers published in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association in the last decades have received a total of 12.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association usually cover Equine (76 papers), Small Animals (285 papers) and Parasitology (163 papers) specifically the topics of Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (134 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (92 papers) and Viral Infections and Vectors (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the South African Veterinary Association are Remo Lobetti, K.E. Joubert, G.E. Swan, Robert M. Kirberger, B.L. Penzhorn, M-L Penrith, Linda S. Jacobson, Wilna Vosloo, C.J. Botha and C.M.E. McCrindle.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.