Drug Design Development and Therapy

4.3k papers and 89.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.3k papers published in Drug Design Development and Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 89.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Drug Design Development and Therapy usually cover Molecular Biology (1.3k papers), Surgery (589 papers) and Oncology (528 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds (184 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (182 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (144 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Drug Design Development and Therapy are Mahmoud E. S. Soliman, Tarek A. Ahmed, Michael A. Nauck, Kok‐Yong Chin, Richard Kones, Bader M. Aljaeid, Ndumiso N. Mhlongo, Umar Ndagi, John K. Triantafillidis and Haijun Zhang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Drug Design Development and Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Drug Design Development and Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Drug Design Development and Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Drug Design Development and Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Drug Design Development and Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Drug Design Development and Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Drug Design Development and Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025