Lucentum
- Topics
- Archaeological and Historical StudiesMedieval Architecture and ArchaeologyArchaeological and Geological Studies
In The Last Decade
Lucentum
330 papers receiving 772 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Archeology 921
- Anthropology 163
- Paleontology 110
- History 93
- Space and Planetary Science 41
Countries where authors publish in Lucentum
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lucentum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lucentum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucentum more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Lucentum
This network shows the impact of papers published in Lucentum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lucentum.
About Lucentum
The 424 papers published in Lucentum in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Lucentum usually cover Archeology (371 papers), Anthropology (55 papers) and General Arts and Humanities (6 papers) specifically the topics of Archaeological and Historical Studies (342 papers), Medieval Architecture and Archaeology (210 papers) and Archaeological and Geological Studies (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lucentum are Lorenzo Abad Casal, Juan Manuel Abascal Palazón, Sonia Gutiérrez Lloret, Mauro S. Hernández Pérez, Martín Almagro Gorbea, Alberto José Lorrio Alvarado, José María Blázquez Martínez, Bernat Martí Oliver, Filippo Coarelli and Paul F. Reynolds.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.