Lusotopie

380 papers and 1.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 380 papers published in Lusotopie in the last decades have received a total of 1.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Lusotopie usually cover Sociology and Political Science (134 papers), Anthropology (124 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (76 papers) specifically the topics of African history and culture studies (72 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (38 papers) and Migration, Racism, and Human Rights (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Lusotopie are Alexis Wick, René Pélissier, Edward A. Alpers, Michel Cahen, Henri Myrttinen, Christine Messiant, Inge Brinkman, Benedict Anderson, Signe Arnfred and Jude Howell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Lusotopie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Lusotopie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Lusotopie.

Countries where authors publish in Lusotopie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Lusotopie. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Lusotopie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lusotopie more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025