Logica Universalis

347 papers and 1.4k indexed citations

About

The 347 papers published in Logica Universalis in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Logica Universalis usually cover Artificial Intelligence (203 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (166 papers) and Philosophy (62 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (186 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (139 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Logica Universalis are Jean-Yves Béziau, Diderik Batens, Hans Smessaert, Henri Prade, Didier Dubois, Roy T. Cook, Terence Parsons, Claudio Pizzi, Till Mossakowski and Sara Negri.

In The Last Decade

Logica Universalis

245 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Logica Universalis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Logica Universalis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Logica Universalis.

Countries where authors publish in Logica Universalis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Logica Universalis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Logica Universalis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Logica Universalis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026