Leukemia & lymphoma

9.7k papers and 150.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.7k papers published in Leukemia & lymphoma in the last decades have received a total of 150.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Leukemia & lymphoma usually cover Hematology (4.0k papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (3.6k papers) and Oncology (3.2k papers) specifically the topics of Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3.5k papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2.4k papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Leukemia & lymphoma are Hagop M. Kantarjian, Tadeusz Robak, Stefano Molica, Andrea Gallamini, Michel Meignan, Michael J. Keating, Benny J. Chen, Aaron Polliack, Ting‐Chao Chou and Varsha Gandhi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Leukemia & lymphoma

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Leukemia & lymphoma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Leukemia & lymphoma.

Countries where authors publish in Leukemia & lymphoma

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Leukemia & lymphoma. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Leukemia & lymphoma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leukemia & lymphoma more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025