PM&R

3.1k papers and 45.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 3.1k papers published in PM&R in the last decades have received a total of 45.8k indexed citations. Papers published in PM&R usually cover Surgery (1.0k papers), Neurology (481 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (464 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (432 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (325 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (295 papers). The most active scholars publishing in PM&R are Kristin L. Sainani, Bruce E. Becker, Jay Smith, Jonathan T. Finnoff, Michael D. Stubblefield, Adam S. Tenforde, Jan Lexell, Michael Fredericson, Basil A. Eldadah and Scott R. Laker.

In The Last Decade

PM&R

2.7k papers receiving 42.4k citations

Fields of papers published in PM&R

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in PM&R. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in PM&R.

Countries where authors publish in PM&R

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in PM&R. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in PM&R with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PM&R more than expected).

Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective 2015 2026 2018 2022 253
  1. Myofascial Trigger Points Then and Now: A Historical and Scientific Perspective (2015)

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026