Law Innovation and Technology

206 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 206 papers published in Law Innovation and Technology in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Law Innovation and Technology usually cover Artificial Intelligence (44 papers), Safety Research (41 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (30 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (40 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (35 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Law Innovation and Technology are Maria Lee, Eliza Mik, Nathalie A. Smuha, Nadezhda Purtova, Roger Brownsword, Bert‐Jaap Koops, Gregory N. Mandel, Ronald Leenes, Lyria Bennett Moses and Andrea Bertolini.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Law Innovation and Technology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Law Innovation and Technology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Law Innovation and Technology.

Countries where authors publish in Law Innovation and Technology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Law Innovation and Technology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Law Innovation and Technology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Law Innovation and Technology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025