Kyushu Journal of Mathematics

543 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 543 papers published in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics usually cover Geometry and Topology (242 papers), Mathematical Physics (203 papers) and Applied Mathematics (193 papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (88 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (75 papers) and Optimal Transport in Geometry and Analysis (70 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics are Takao Komatsu, Bang‐Yen Chen, Mitsuo Kato, Shuichi Kawashima, Raimundas Vidūnas, Masato Wakayama, Tetsuro Miyakawa, Taekyun Kim, Susumu Ishikawa and Keiji Matsumoto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Kyushu Journal of Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kyushu Journal of Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025