Esophagus
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Oncology
- Gastroenterology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Fields
- Gastroenterology (191 papers)Surgery (797 papers)Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (550 papers)
- Topics
- Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentEsophageal and GI PathologyGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
In The Last Decade
Esophagus
829 papers receiving 8.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Surgery 6.6k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 4.9k
- Oncology 1.5k
- Gastroenterology 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 522
Countries where authors publish in Esophagus
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Esophagus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Esophagus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esophagus more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Esophagus
This network shows the impact of papers published in Esophagus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Esophagus.
About Esophagus
The 919 papers published in Esophagus in the last decades have received a total of 8.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Esophagus usually cover Gastroenterology (191 papers), Surgery (797 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (550 papers) specifically the topics of Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (526 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (469 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (278 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Esophagus are Hisahiro Matsubara, Tsuneo Oyama, Takashi Uno, Yasushi Toh, Yuko Kitagawa, Soji Ozawa, Yuichiro� Doki, Harushi Udagawa, Hodaka Numasaki and Hiroyuki Kuwano.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.