Countries where authors publish in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Trauma & Dissociation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation.
About Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
The 851 papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation in the last decades have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation usually cover Clinical Psychology (641 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (403 papers) and Philosophy (125 papers) specifically the topics of Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (392 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (248 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (184 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (133 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (128 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (122 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (105 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (100 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Trauma & Dissociation are Ellert R. S. Nijenhuis, Jennifer J. Freyd, Paul F. Dell, Colin A. Ross, Anne P. DePrince, Onno van der Hart, Adriano Schimmenti, Vedat Şar, Richard J. Brown and Giovanni Liotti.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.