Journal of women's history

1.1k papers and 5.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Journal of women's history in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of women's history usually cover Sociology and Political Science (655 papers), History (385 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (266 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (291 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (180 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of women's history are Adrienne Rich, Alison Kafer, Susan Geiger, Carole Shammas, Mónica McWilliams, Saskia E. Wieringa, E. Frances White, Joan B. Landes, Margot Badran and Bronwyn Winter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of women's history

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of women's history. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of women's history.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of women's history

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of women's history. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of women's history with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of women's history more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025