Journal of Policy Practice

210 papers and 1.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 210 papers published in Journal of Policy Practice in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Policy Practice usually cover General Health Professions (92 papers), Sociology and Political Science (77 papers) and Public Administration (59 papers) specifically the topics of Homelessness and Social Issues (45 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (45 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (35 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Policy Practice are Richard Hoefer, Idit Weiss‐Gal, Leila Patel, Michael Sherraden, Chien‐Chung Huang, John G. McNutt, Margaret Lombe, Shannon R. Lane, Emily M. Douglas and Amy Conley Wright.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Policy Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Policy Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Policy Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Policy Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Policy Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Policy Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Policy Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025