Journal of Policy History

605 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 605 papers published in Journal of Policy History in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Policy History usually cover Political Science and International Relations (295 papers), Sociology and Political Science (230 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (86 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (93 papers), American History and Culture (84 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Policy History are Susan M. Reverby, Paul Pierson, Richard R. John, Julian E. Zelizer, Howard Kunreuther, Scott Gabriel Knowles, Monica Prasad, Peter Baldwin, Carl Abbott and Raymond A. Mohl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Policy History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Policy History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Policy History.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Policy History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Policy History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Policy History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Policy History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025