Journal of Neurocytology

2.1k papers and 89.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Journal of Neurocytology in the last decades have received a total of 89.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Neurocytology usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k papers), Molecular Biology (884 papers) and Developmental Neuroscience (426 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (515 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (409 papers) and Nerve injury and regeneration (369 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Neurocytology are Alan Peters, Charles E. Ribak, P. P. C. Graziadei, G. A. Monti Graziadei, W. F. Blakemore, Helga Kolb, Joaquı́n M. Fuster, Georg W. Kreutzberg, John G. Parnavelas and Giorgio Gabella.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Neurocytology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Neurocytology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Neurocytology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Neurocytology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Neurocytology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Neurocytology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Neurocytology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025