Heart Rhythm O2

427 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 427 papers published in Heart Rhythm O2 in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Heart Rhythm O2 usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (400 papers), Surgery (53 papers) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (24 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (280 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (202 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (183 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Heart Rhythm O2 are Kenneth A. Ellenbogen, Santosh K. Padala, Jason G. Andrade, Rahul Khanna, Jonathan P. Piccini, Abhishek Deshmukh, Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman, Anne M. Gillis, Dennis H. Lau and Loryn J. Bohne.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Heart Rhythm O2

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Heart Rhythm O2. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Heart Rhythm O2.

Countries where authors publish in Heart Rhythm O2

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Heart Rhythm O2. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Heart Rhythm O2 with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heart Rhythm O2 more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025