Analytical Cellular Pathology

947 papers and 15.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 947 papers published in Analytical Cellular Pathology in the last decades have received a total of 15.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Analytical Cellular Pathology usually cover Molecular Biology (421 papers), Cancer Research (233 papers) and Oncology (229 papers) specifically the topics of AI in cancer detection (96 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (72 papers) and Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Analytical Cellular Pathology are Gerrit A. Meijer, Ewert Bengtsson, Alfred Böcking, M. K. Casparie, Alma van de Pol, J.H.J.M. van Krieken, Gary T. Burger, A.T.M.G. Tiebosch, P. J. van Diest and Kenneth Maiese.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Analytical Cellular Pathology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Analytical Cellular Pathology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Analytical Cellular Pathology.

Countries where authors publish in Analytical Cellular Pathology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Analytical Cellular Pathology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Analytical Cellular Pathology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analytical Cellular Pathology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025