AACN Advanced Critical Care

1.3k papers and 8.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in AACN Advanced Critical Care in the last decades have received a total of 8.7k indexed citations. Papers published in AACN Advanced Critical Care usually cover General Health Professions (264 papers), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (256 papers) and Surgery (235 papers) specifically the topics of Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (178 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (165 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (136 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AACN Advanced Critical Care are Cynda Hylton Rushton, Sandra K. Hanneman, Marjorie Funk, Sue Sendelbach, Chris Winkelman, Linda Harrington, Bridie Kent, Nancy Blake, Michelle Aebersold and Ellyn E. Matthews.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in AACN Advanced Critical Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AACN Advanced Critical Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AACN Advanced Critical Care.

Countries where authors publish in AACN Advanced Critical Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AACN Advanced Critical Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AACN Advanced Critical Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AACN Advanced Critical Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025