Countries where authors publish in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics.
About Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics
The 679 papers published in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics in the last decades have received a total of 10.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics usually cover Geophysics (592 papers), Ocean Engineering (541 papers) and Environmental Engineering (72 papers) specifically the topics of Geophysical Methods and Applications (499 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (388 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (367 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics are Douglas LaBrecque, D. Ravat, Richard D. Miller, Choon B. Park, I. J. Won, John Peterson, Xianjin Yang, J. Carlos Santamarina, Jianghai Xia and William Daily.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.