International Social Security Review

791 papers and 6.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 791 papers published in International Social Security Review in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations. Papers published in International Social Security Review usually cover General Health Professions (379 papers), Political Science and International Relations (285 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (190 papers) specifically the topics of Social Policy and Reform Studies (252 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (193 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (154 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Social Security Review are Alan Walker, Robert Holzmann, Nicholas Barr, Guy Carrin, Laura B. Rawlings, Wouter van Ginneken, Peter Whiteford, Roddy McKinnon, Bernard Casey and Monika Queisser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Social Security Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Social Security Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Social Security Review.

Countries where authors publish in International Social Security Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Social Security Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Social Security Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Social Security Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025