Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

294 papers and 3.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 294 papers published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis usually cover Economics and Econometrics (217 papers), General Decision Sciences (41 papers) and General Health Professions (36 papers) specifically the topics of Economic and Environmental Valuation (126 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (46 papers) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (46 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis are James K. Hammitt, Lisa A. Robinson, W. Kip Viscusi, Clayton J. Masterman, B. Douglas Bernheim, Linda Thunström, Jason F. Shogren, Aidan R. Vining, Madison Ashworth and Stephen C. Newbold.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025