Clayton J. Masterman
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 10%
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Co-authors
- W. Kip Viscusi
- Topics
- Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Clayton J. Masterman
12 papers receiving 344 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Economics and Econometrics 205
- General Health Professions 109
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 95
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 37
- General Decision Sciences 25
Countries citing papers authored by Clayton J. Masterman
This map shows the geographic impact of Clayton J. Masterman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clayton J. Masterman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clayton J. Masterman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clayton J. Masterman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clayton J. Masterman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clayton J. Masterman. The network helps show where Clayton J. Masterman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clayton J. Masterman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clayton J. Masterman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clayton J. Masterman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clayton J. Masterman. Clayton J. Masterman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | The Specific Consumer Expectations Test for Product Defects | 2 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 57 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | Income Elasticities and Global Values of a Statistical Lifebreakdown → | 226 |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | The Customer Is Not Always Right: Balancing Worker and Customer Welfare in Antitrust Law | 1 |
| 13 | 11 |
About Clayton J. Masterman
Clayton J. Masterman is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Public Administration, having authored 13 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (25 citations), Economics and Econometrics (205 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (95 citations). Clayton J. Masterman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include W. Kip Viscusi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vanderbilt law review and Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.