Virginia Law Review

1.5k papers and 13.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Virginia Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 13.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Virginia Law Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (476 papers), Law (430 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (322 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (213 papers), Economic Analysis of Law and Legal Systems (150 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Virginia Law Review are Lynn A. Stout, Barry R. Weingast, Roger G. Noll, Margaret M. Blair, Henry G. Manne, John C. Coffee, Michael Klausner, Norman S. Poser, Richard Delgado and Richard L. Revesz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Virginia Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Virginia Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Virginia Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Virginia Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Virginia Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Virginia Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025