Japan focus

379 papers and 809 indexed citations i.

About

The 379 papers published in Japan focus in the last decades have received a total of 809 indexed citations. Papers published in Japan focus usually cover Sociology and Political Science (129 papers), Cultural Studies (91 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (53 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (72 papers), Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (39 papers) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japan focus are Tessa Morris‐Suzuki, Elizabeth J. Perry, Jenny Chan, Gavan McCormack, Mark Selden, Milton Osborne, Carolyn L. Hsu, Rumi Sakamoto, David Chapman and John A. Mathews.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japan focus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japan focus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japan focus.

Countries where authors publish in Japan focus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japan focus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japan focus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japan focus more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025