Countries where authors publish in Journal of Arrhythmia
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Arrhythmia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Arrhythmia more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia.
About Journal of Arrhythmia
The 1.8k papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia in the last decades have received a total of 9.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.5k papers), Internal Medicine (16 papers), Surgery (169 papers), Neurology (45 papers) and Emergency Medical Services (15 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (737 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (642 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (546 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (532 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (90 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (85 papers), ECG Monitoring and Analysis (73 papers) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Arrhythmia are Gary Tse, Minoru Horie, Naokata Sumitomo, Rajnish Joshi, Seiko Ohno, Agam Bansal, Lan S. Chen, Yongkeun Cho, Gregory Y.H. Lip and Jyh‐Ming Jimmy Juang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.