Journal of Arrhythmia

1.7k papers and 8.9k indexed citations

About

The 1.7k papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.6k papers), Surgery (213 papers) and Molecular Biology (119 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1.1k papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (805 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (772 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Arrhythmia are Gary Tse, Naokata Sumitomo, Minoru Horie, Seiko Ohno, Rajnish Joshi, Agam Bansal, Yongkeun Cho, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Ken Okumura and Jyh‐Ming Jimmy Juang.

In The Last Decade

Journal of Arrhythmia

1.5k papers receiving 8.7k citations

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Arrhythmia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Arrhythmia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Arrhythmia more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Arrhythmia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026